Insights
Stay ahead with our legal insights. Our thought leadership explores the shifts redefining corporate law, insolvency, and property — offering perspective, context, and strategic guidance to help you navigate change with confidence.
By Mustafa Mohamed, Attorney and Director: Vezi & de Beer Inc.
When advocates sue attorneys, something deeper than a fee dispute is at play. It signals that the professional bond designed to serve justice has started to fray. And when that bond fails, the ripple effects reach far beyond the chambers—they reach the client. For people already under strain, that discord becomes another wound. The law meant to protect them instead exhausts them.
This isn’t theoretical. Recent matters on the rolls show colleague-against-colleague disputes:
Diederichs v Ravele (Gauteng, 2023) — Advocate sued for outstanding fees; attorney alleged delayed or incomplete work.
Solomon v Junkeeparsad (Durban, 2022) — Advocate sought payment on multiple matters; court reaffirmed that attorneys are legally responsible for paying counsel once briefs are issued.
Maite v Borman Duma Zitha Attorneys (Johannesburg, 2023) — Advocate claimed unpaid invoices; the firm argued duplication and disagreement on rates.
Dayanand-Jugroop v Ngento (Gauteng, 2024) — Advocate sued for fees; attorney alleged overreaching.
WHEN LEGAL TURNS ON LEGAL, JUSTICE FOR ALL IS DENIED
By Mustafa Mohamed, Attorney and Director: Vezi & de Beer Inc. When advocates sue attorneys, something deeper than a fee dispute is at play. It signals that the professional bond designed to serve justice has started to fray. And when…
By Mustafa Mohamed, Attorney and Director: Vezi & de Beer Inc.
When advocates sue attorneys, something deeper than a fee dispute is at play. It signals that the professional bond designed to serve justice has started to fray. And when that bond fails, the ripple effects reach far beyond the chambers—they reach the client. For people already under strain, that discord becomes another wound. The law meant to protect them instead exhausts them.
This isn’t theoretical. Recent matters on the rolls show colleague-against-colleague disputes:
Diederichs v Ravele (Gauteng, 2023) — Advocate sued for outstanding fees; attorney alleged delayed or incomplete work.
Solomon v Junkeeparsad (Durban, 2022) — Advocate sought payment on multiple matters; court reaffirmed that attorneys are legally responsible for paying counsel once briefs are issued.
Maite v Borman Duma Zitha Attorneys (Johannesburg, 2023) — Advocate claimed unpaid invoices; the firm argued duplication and disagreement on rates.
Dayanand-Jugroop v Ngento (Gauteng, 2024) — Advocate sued for fees; attorney alleged overreaching.
WHEN LEGAL TURNS ON LEGAL, JUSTICE FOR ALL IS DENIED
By Mustafa Mohamed, Attorney and Director: Vezi & de Beer Inc. When advocates sue attorneys, something deeper than a fee dispute is at play. It signals that the professional bond designed to serve justice has started to fray. And when…